The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) submitted a touch upon the proposed stablecoin regulatory regime in Hong Kong on the final day of the remark interval. The advocacy group’s five-page letter contained substantial criticism of the proposed reserve and operational necessities and mounted a full of life protection of algorithmic stablecoins, which Hong Kong authorities had taken a dim view of.
The Hong Kong Financial Authority (HKMA) and Monetary Providers and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) released a consultation paper on Dec. 27. The proposed regulatory framework foresaw licensing stablecoin issuers that had an workplace in Hong Kong with senior supervisor current and reserves “a minimum of equal to the par worth.”
“We applaud FSTB and HKMA for taking essential first steps in crafting a regulatory regime,” the CCI wrote. Nonetheless, it noticed potential issues forward. Reserve necessities could possibly be an “outsized burden” in the event that they duplicate necessities in different international locations, the CCI wrote, and:
“Taking into account the worldwide nature of many cryptoasset companies, guaranteeing that there’s a bodily presence of senior administration and key personnel in Hong Kong could also be a problem.”
The CCI urged a risk-based strategy to order necessities and beneficial an “equivalence framework” harmonized with different jurisdictions that may enable issuers to function in Hong Kong equally to Japan, the place issuers’ licenses from different international locations are acknowledged after evaluate.
A lot of the CCI letter was taken up by a dialogue of algorithmic stablecoins. The proposal would deal with all stablecoins equally, it claimed:
“An issuer of an FRS [fiat-referenced stablecoin] that derives its worth from arbitrage or algorithm will fall below the scope of the regulatory regime, however it will likely be extremely unlikely that such issuer will meet the proposed licensing standards.”
An algorithmic stablecoin can be unable to fulfill reserve necessities, the paperwork said.
Algorithmic stablecoins suffered a reputational black eye after the collapse of the Terra/LUNA ecosystem, however the CCI was bullish on them. “CCI needs to respectfully spotlight algorithmic stablecoins as an essential class of innovation meriting its personal set of narrowly tailor-made guardrails and associated necessities,” it wrote.
Not all algorithmic stablecoins are equal, CCI stated. Nevertheless, an overcollateralized stablecoin with exogenous collateral can enhance effectivity in decentralized finance with “real-time auditability and automatic liquidation programs.” Rejecting such innovation can be self-defeating.
The advantages of algorithmic stablecoins are proportional to the extent of their decentralization, CCI stated, and it beneficial that the HKMA and FSTB set “decentralization thresholds” for them.
The CCI additionally spoke up for stablecoins tied to cryptocurrencies. Cash comparable to Dai (DAI), RAI and LUSD, backed by Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), had been unaffected by the current market downturn, it identified.
Associated: Fair crypto laws ‘possible’ in the US, but ‘a lot of work’ needed — Crypto Council adviser
